Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1577

reference
354-tree-1
name
1577
tree-preservation-order

undefined

354-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.045915 50.893562)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.045815 50.893552,-1.045820 50.893571,-1.045834 50.893589,-1.045855 50.893603,-1.045883 50.893612,-1.045914 50.893616,-1.045944 50.893613,-1.045972 50.893604,-1.045995 50.893590,-1.046009 50.893573,-1.046014 50.893553,-1.046010 50.893534,-1.045996 50.893516,-1.045974 50.893502,-1.045947 50.893493,-1.045916 50.893490,-1.045885 50.893493,-1.045858 50.893501,-1.045835 50.893515,-1.045821 50.893532,-1.045815 50.893552)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL